Answer the security questionnaire in the room
By the end of this lesson you can answer the training, retention, and residency questions a client security review asks, and state exactly what ZDR does and doesn't cover.
The questionnaire is the first item in pre-kickoff for a reason
Every activation plan starts with the security onboarding questionnaire, because nothing else proceeds until it clears. Three questions decide it.
You've already practiced the stakes: in the Meridian scenario, one wrong ZDR answer in front of a CISO cost more credibility than any architecture diagram earned back. This lesson gives you the complete answers, so the questionnaire becomes a meeting you run rather than a form you fear.
The answers, with the nuances that survive fact-checking
Half-right answers are worse than no answer, because security teams verify. These are the complete versions.
Training: Anthropic does not train generative models on code or prompts sent to Claude Code under commercial terms: Team, Enterprise, API, and the cloud paths alike. The one exception is explicit opt-in, such as the Development Partner Program, which an org admin must actively join, and which isn't even available on Bedrock or Vertex. Say "no, unless you explicitly opt in," not "no, never": the qualified version survives the client's own research. Retention: Server-side retention is governed by the customer agreement; confirm the current retention window with your account team or the Anthropic privacy documentation rather than quoting a number that may not match their plan. And the answer endpoint-security teams actually need: Claude Code also caches session transcripts locally on each developer's machine, in plaintext under the user's home directory, configurable via settings. That's a device-management conversation, not a cloud one.
Where inference data lives, by path
Zero data retention is a scope, not a slogan
ZDR applies to Claude Code on Claude for Enterprise, enabled per organization by the Anthropic account team after eligibility review. It is not in the standard Enterprise plan by default, and it is not available on the cloud paths.
Also worth saying in the room: analytics under ZDR shows usage metrics but not contribution metrics, so the Day 30 scorecard should be designed around what will actually be measurable. Each new org under the same account needs its own enablement, which is a detail that bites multi-org enterprises at rollout.
Residency follows the path. Certifications follow the Trust Center
If the client has a hard residency requirement, the cloud paths are where region control lives: Bedrock offers region selection across AWS regions, Vertex offers global, multi-region, and regional endpoints.
On the direct path, service availability follows Anthropic's supported countries; specific region-level processing guarantees are an account-team conversation, and the honest move is to say so rather than improvise one. For the certification half of the questionnaire, the artifact set is self-serve at trust.anthropic.com: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017 and 27018 for cloud security and privacy, ISO/IEC 42001 for AI management systems, CSA STAR Level 2, HIPAA with BAA available, GDPR, NIST 800-171 attestation, FedRAMP High through Claude for Government, and annual third-party penetration test summaries. Knowing that list from memory is optional; knowing it's all downloadable the same day the CISO asks is not.
Answer from the facts you can cite, name the one thing you'll verify, and never improvise a guarantee. Security teams forgive "I'll confirm the region commitment." They don't forgive a wrong yes.
Corvane Health's CISO reads the questions out loud
A life-sciences client, pre-kickoff, and the CISO wants answers in the meeting, not in a follow-up email. Five questions, ten points. This is the course's final gate.
Click a card to commit. Choices lock, consequences land. Green is a strong call, orange is defensible, grey costs you the room.
With path recommendation, gateway design, and data residency complete, this document answers every question a client security review will raise before the rollout can begin.
You've covered the four deployment paths, the gateway decision, and the data residency questions that come up in every security review. Before moving on: take a sample client profile and recommend a deployment path. Write up the rationale — cloud commitments, data residency position, and the parity gaps that would affect this client. That's the core of the Deployment Decision Doc, and the judgment call you'll need to make on every engagement.